I have seen in social media, artists upset that others have been using their designs on products WITHOUT getting permission.
Perhaps creatives need to learn about licensing.
I gathered here some information and resources:
To get royalties for your artwork, license your images to people who need artwork for their products and in return, you can earn a fee. This is called artwork licensing. Alternatively, upload your artwork to
products on print-on-demand websites such as Printful or Red Bubble,
and receive a royalty based on a percentage of each sale made. 4.
It
really is that simple. The receptionist may provide you with an email
address or give you a name and extension to call. Sometimes, a quick
search of the manufacturer's website will reveal that they accept
submissions from artists for licensing. If so, follow the instructions
on the site to reach out to the company.
So sometimes you license your
art and you don't get that recognition. Your signature isn't on it,
you're doing private label. Some private label will have your name and
your brand, and some, well it depends on what you agree to. There's people that are doing it very part-time, maybe they're making a couple hundred, a couple thousand.
5.
Mock-up a catalog. If you have the skills, create a portfolio of
products that your art would be great on. If you want to do toys, create
some with your work. If you want to sell yourself as a voiceover,
create pretend commercials or jingles that you'd do.
Licensing
your art makes it easy to gain more customers and generate sales.
"Traditional art licensing deals allow artists to receive a royalty
payment, typically doled out quarterly, for the products with their art
on them that have sold," George says. "This means an artist can do some
upfront work to arrange the licensing deal, and then get ...
Updated info July 18, 2022
Abbott Elementary,' Quinta Brunson sued for copyright infringement
https://www.inquirer.com/news/ abbott-elementary-quinta- brunson-lawsuit-sued- copyright-infringement- 20220718.html
https://www.inquirer.com/news/
Comments